Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/240528 
Year of Publication: 
2021
Series/Report no.: 
IFN Working Paper No. 1385
Publisher: 
Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm
Abstract: 
We examine the conceptualization of entrepreneurs in neo-Schumpeterian growth theory, which has reintroduced entrepreneurs into mainstream economics. Specifically, we analyze how neo-Schumpeterians relate to the contradiction between the entrepreneur-centered view of Schumpeter (1934) and the entrepreneurless framework of Schumpeter (1942), with the two frameworks entailing vastly different economic and policy implications. The analysis is based on a review of approximately 750 peer-reviewed articles over the period 1990-2018. The articles were identified using text mining methodology and supervised machine learning. The results show that the literature leans towards Schumpeter (1942); innovation returns are modeled as following an ex ante known probability distribution. By assuming that the outcomes of innovation activities are (probabilistically) deterministic, the Schumpeterian entrepreneur becomes redundant. In addition, the literature abstracts from genuine uncertainty, thus evading central issues regarding the economic function of the entrepreneur, especially with respect to disruptive innovations, ownership, and profits. To incorporate genuine uncertainty, the literature needs to adopt a broader conceptual foundation that goes beyond equilibrium modeling.
Subjects: 
Creative destruction
Economic growth
Entrepreneur
Innovation
Judgment
Bibliometric analysis
Knightian uncertainty
JEL: 
O10
O30
B40
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
490.53 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.