Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/240457 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2020
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
IFN Working Paper No. 1314
Verlag: 
Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Stockholm
Zusammenfassung: 
A sizeable literature analyzes the appropriate interpretation of FRAND commitments for standard-essential patents. With few exceptions, the literature disregards international dimensions, despite the fact that most standards are used in international markets. This paper uses a simple economic setting to assess pros and cons of the main jurisdictional bases in international law—the Territoriality and Nationality Principles—when national regulatory authorities have conflicting views regarding the appropriate interpretation of FRAND commitments. The paper identifies situations where the bases can implement efficient outcomes, and where they fail. The paper also shows how non-discrimination obligations might improve upon the outcomes.
Schlagwörter: 
Standard-essential patents
International jurisdiction
Default rules
JEL: 
F15
K21
K33
L40
O38
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
255.72 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.