Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/23808
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPerugini, Marcoen_US
dc.contributor.authorTan, Jonathan H. W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZizzo, Daniel Johnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-30T12:03:02Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-30T12:03:02Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/23808-
dc.description.abstractPersonality questionnaires have been used and can be used to predictbehavior in economic settings. Using two sets of state-of-the-art measuresfrom personality psychology (the Big Six) and social psychology (SocialValue Orientation), we find that the behavior of men is predictable in thefirst half of a public good contribution experiment, whereas that of womenis not. This result agrees with the reinterpretation of Carol Gilligan's (1982)view that women are more sensitive to the context in which decisions aremade.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aDiskussionspapiere / Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät |x236en_US
dc.subject.jelC91en_US
dc.subject.jelJ16en_US
dc.subject.jelH41en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordgenderen_US
dc.subject.keywordcontexten_US
dc.subject.keywordpersonalityen_US
dc.subject.keywordpublic goodsen_US
dc.subject.stwÖffentliches Guten_US
dc.subject.stwSpieltheorieen_US
dc.subject.stwGeschlechten_US
dc.subject.stwPersönlichkeitspsychologieen_US
dc.subject.stwExperimenten_US
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden_US
dc.titleWhich is the More Predictable Gender? Public Good Contribution and Personalityen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn499717759en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:euvwdp:236-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
595.67 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.