Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
|dc.contributor.author||Goethals, George R.||en_US|
|dc.description.abstract||A study was conducted to see whether peer effects could be observed amongundergraduates at Williams College, an elite four-year liberal arts school. Specifically,the study explored whether students in the bottom third of their class, with average SAT'sof about 1300, would perform better in writing about newspaper articles they read anddiscussed in groups of three if the two others in the group were academically superior --from the top third of their class, with SAT's averaging about 1500 -- rather than similar --also from the bottom third of the class. The results showed that women subjectsperformed better if their discussion partners were from the top third of the class, but mendid better if their discussion partners were from the bottom third. Alternative analysescomparing subjects who had better or worse discussion partners as determined by thequality of their peers videotaped discussion statements, showed that across gendersubjects did better written work when their discussion partners were better. The resultswere interpreted in terms of the principles of social comparison theory (Festinger, 1954).||en_US|
|dc.relation.ispartofseries|||aWPEHE discussion paper series / Williams College, Williams Project on the Economics of Higher Education |x55||en_US|
|dc.title||Social comparison and peer effects at an elite college||en_US|
Files in This Item:
Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.