Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/232809
Authors: 
Davillas, Apostolos
Jones, Andrew M.
Year of Publication: 
2021
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 14057
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
We use data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS) to compare measures of socioeconomic inequality in psychological distress, measured by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), before (Waves 9 and the Interim 2019 Wave) and during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (April to July 2020). Based on a caseness measure, the prevalence of psychological distress increased from 18.5% to 27.7% between the 2019 Wave and April 2020 with some reversion to earlier levels in subsequent months. Also, there was a systematic increase in total inequality in the Likert GHQ-12 score. However, measures of relative socioeconomic inequality have not increased. A Shapley-Shorrocks decomposition analysis shows that during the peak of the first wave of the pandemic (April 2020) other socioeconomic factors declined in their share of socioeconomic inequality, while age and gender account for a larger share. The most notable increase is evident for younger women. The contribution of working in an industry related to the COVID-19 response played a small role at Wave 9 and the Interim 2019 Wave, but more than tripled its share in April 2020. As the first wave of COVID-19 progressed, the contribution of demographics declined from their peak level in April and chronic health conditions, housing conditions, and neighbourhood characteristics increased their contributions to socioeconomic inequality.
Subjects: 
mental health
GHQ
socioeconomic inequality
health equity
COVID-19
psychological distress
JEL: 
C1
D63
I12
I14
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
694.41 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.