Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/232617 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 13865
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
It is sometimes said that an effect of the COVID-19 pandemic will be heightened appreciation of the importance of scientific research and expertise. We test this hypothesis by examining how exposure to previous epidemics affected trust in science and scientists. Building on the "impressionable years hypothesis" that attitudes are durably formed during the ages 18 to 25, we focus on individuals exposed to epidemics in their country of residence at this particular stage of the life course. Combining data from a 2018 Wellcome Trust survey of more than 75,000 individuals in 138 countries with data on global epidemics since 1970, we show that such exposure has no impact on views of science as an endeavor but that it significantly reduces trust in scientists and in the benefits of their work. We also illustrate that the decline in trust is driven by the individuals with little previous training in science subjects. Finally, our evidence suggests that epidemic-induced distrust translates into lower compliance with health-related policies in the form of negative views towards vaccines and lower rates of child vaccination.
Subjects: 
impressionable years
scientists
COVID-19
epidemics
trust
JEL: 
D83
F50
I19
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.32 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.