Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/231515
Authors: 
Pühringer, Stephan
Porak, Laura
Rath, Johanna
Year of Publication: 
2021
Series/Report no.: 
ICAE Working Paper Series No. 123
Abstract: 
In this paper, we apply a discourse analytical framework to explore the performativity of the economic concept of competition in public policy discourses. We focus on the role of professional economists as opinion leaders to analyze how concepts of competition have entered public discourses. The main economic imaginary ascribes to competition the function of a primary mode for economic and social coordination, ensuring prosperity and wealth. Competitiveness is predominately interpreted not as a means but an end in itself. Furthermore, three partly conflicting discursive positions on how competition should be organized arise in the discourse: first, the neoliberal position interprets every non-efficient market outcome as the result of institutional intervention, hindering effective competition; second, the ordoliberal position of fair competition evaluates governance intervention positively, as long as they promote the functioning of competition; third, the Keynesian position promotes corrected competition, i.e. diverse policy intervention to compensate for market failure outcomes.
Subjects: 
competition
competitiveness
media debates
consulting
economic experts
critical discourse analysis
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
495.47 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.