Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/228451 
Year of Publication: 
2021
Citation: 
[Journal:] American Political Science Review [ISSN:] 1537-5943 [Volume:] 115 [Issue:] 1 [Publisher:] Cambridge University Press [Place:] Cambridge [Year:] 2021 [Pages:] 218-233
Publisher: 
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Abstract: 
Previous research on institutional change has concentrated on two types of explanations. On one hand, the dualism of path dependency and critical junctures has advanced our understanding of how institutional change occurs due to sudden exogenous shocks. On the other hand, more recent critiques have established a better understanding of endogenous, gradual change. This article is motivated by observations that current research tends to overlook what I call the “missing diagonal.” I argue that we need to disentangle the sources of a cause (exogenous vs. endogenous) from its time horizon (sudden vs. gradual). By cross-tabulating these two dimensions, the proposed typology of institutional change explanations is able to capture complex multilayered as well as sequential arguments of institutional change. The typology urges scholars to be more precise with their social science language of erosion and decay, while serving as a generator for an innovative research agenda on endogenous ruptures.
Subjects: 
institutional change
sociological theory
typology
cause
path dependence
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.