Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/228105
Authors: 
Chikumbi, Lydia
Scasny, Milan
Muchapondwa, Edwin
Thiam, Djiby
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
IES Working Paper No. 23/2020
Abstract: 
Recently, the South African wine industry launched the world's first "no sulphite added" wine made from indigenous Rooibos & Honey bush toasted wood chips. This wood chip contains antioxidants properties known to protect the wine from oxidation. On the other hand, SO2, as a preservative, is often perceived by wine consumers as causing headaches and migraine. Differentiated wines based on their SO2 content may be a profitable marketing avenue for the struggling industry. We interviewed more than 600 wine consumers to investigate perceptions on wine preservatives and to elicit willingness to pay for the innovative alternative based on Rooibos & Honey bush wood chips. Alongside the wine preservatives, we also examine consumers' preferences for organic wine attribute and wine quality measured by 100-points quality score, and the cost. Based on the results from the mixed logit model, we find that consumers are willing to pay additionally R56.48(€3.53) per bottle of wine with natural Rooibos & Honey bush wood chips, while they are ready to pay R19.52(€1.22) more for organic wine and R1.60(€0.10) for each point on quality score. Consumer preferences are not statistically different between red and white wine but differ considerably across consumers, in particular, those who believe SO2 in wine cause headaches are willing to pay for replacing sulphur-based preservatives by a natural one at least three times more. Marketing implications are offered for the wine industry.
Subjects: 
wine preservatives
willingness to pay
discrete choice experiment
JEL: 
O31
Q10
P46
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
672.51 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.