Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/227320
Authors: 
Beam, Emily A.
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 13793
Abstract: 
This paper examines how individuals select into job search in terms of their individual qualifications and perceptions and measures how recruiting additional applicants with a modest job-search subsidy affects selection. I use experimental evidence to examine individuals' decisions to attend and participate in a job fair. Thirteen percent of invited but unsubsidized respondents attend the job fair, and they are positively selected from the overall distribution of respondents. While the subsidy attracts those who are less qualified and less confident in their ability to find work abroad, the least qualified do not search intensively. Although the subsidy does not lead to any additional offers, it induces individuals with a high degree of uncertainty about their likelihood of job-finding to apply with recruitment agencies. These results demonstrate the importance of imperfect information about the returns to search and highlight how reducing search costs can increase search effort among those most uncertain about their prospects.
Subjects: 
recruitment
job search
perceived returns
migration
field experiment
JEL: 
O15
J64
D83
C93
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
988.45 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.