Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/227213
Authors: 
Dickinson, David L.
McEvoy, David M.
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 13686
Abstract: 
Recent policies require some interactions previously conducted in close social proximity (e.g., school, workplace) to take place remotely, which motivates our investigation of how in-person versus online environments impact honesty. We modify a well-known coin-flip task and examine the influence of going from the physical laboratory environment, to online with identifiable participants (same lab subject pool), to online with anonymous participants using mTurk. Surprisingly, while a simple move from in-lab to online (using the same subject pool) appears to increase "fake effort" – those who likely never flip the coin - it does not predict more dishonest behavior when there is a monetary incentive to cheat. The most socially distant and anonymous participants (mTurk) are more likely to be deemed cheaters in our analysis—these individuals report coin flip outcomes consistent with cheating for monetary gain. Implications of our findings indicate the greatest risk of potentially costly dishonest behavior results when anonymity, not just social distance, is high.
Subjects: 
coin flip
behavioral economics
anonymity
cheating
social distance
experiment
JEL: 
C91
D90
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
480.43 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.