Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/223816
Authors: 
Adams-Prassl, Abigail
Boneva, Teodora
Golin, Marta
Rauh, Christopher
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 13374
Abstract: 
Using large, geographically representative surveys from the US and UK, we document variation in the percentage of tasks workers can do from home. We highlight three dimensions of heterogeneity that have previously been neglected. First, the share of tasks that can be done from home varies considerably both across as well as within occupations and industries. The distribution of the share of tasks that can be done from home within occupations, industries, and occupation-industry pairs is systematic and remarkably consistent across countries and survey waves. Second, as the pandemic has progressed, the share of workers who can do all tasks from home has increased most in those occupations in which the pre-existing share was already high. Third, even within occupations and industries, we find that women can do fewer tasks from home. Using machine-learning methods, we extend our working-from-home measure to all disaggregated occupation-industry pairs. The measure we present in this paper is a critical input for models considering the possibility to work from home, including models used to assess the impact of the pandemic or design policies targeted at reopening the economy.
Subjects: 
working from home
occupations
industry
Coronavirus
COVID-19
telework
JEL: 
J21
J24
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.52 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.