Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/22374 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2003
Series/Report no.: 
Finanzwissenschaftliche Arbeitspapiere No. 68
Publisher: 
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Gießen
Abstract: 
This paper provides a theoretical model of party competition in a heterogeneous electorate. The latter consists of numerous groups of dominant-issue-voters who base their voting decision primarily on one issue of the political agenda. Parties follow a lexicographic objective function, aiming to gain power at minimum programmatic concessions. The emerging pattern of movement in policy platforms is fundamentally different to the concept of convergence proposed by the spatial theory of voting. Rather than the centre of the scale of policy preference, its extreme ends, occupied by dominant-issue-voters, attract the policy platforms. The difference in policy platforms is not reduced. The conclusions are found to be compatible with some major empirical findings of the Manifesto Research Group.
Subjects: 
voters
incomplete information
political parties
convergence
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
299.34 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.