Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/222473
Authors: 
Dragano, Nico
Siegrist, Johannes
Nyberg, Solja T.
Lunau, Thorsten
Fransson, Eleonor I.
Alfredsson, Lars
Bjorner, Jakob B.
Borritz, Marianne
Burr, Hermann
Erbel, Raimund
Fahlen, Göran
Goldberg, Marcel
Hamer, Mark
Heikkilä, Katriina
Jöckel, Karl-Heinz
Madsen, Ida E.H.
Nielsen, Martin L.
Nordin, Maria
Oksanen, Tuula
Pejtersen, Jan H.
Pentti, Jaana
Rugulies, Reiner
Salo, Paula
Schupp, Jürgen
Singh-Manoux, Archana
Steptoe, Andrew
Theorell, Töres
Vahtera, Jussi
Westerholm, Peter J. M.
Westerlund, Hugo
Virtanen, Marianna
Zins, Marie
Batty, G. David
Kivimäki, Mika
Year of Publication: 
2017
Citation: 
[Journal:] Epidemiology [Volume:] 28 [Issue:] 4 [Pages:] 619-626 [ISSN:] 1044-3983
Abstract: 
Background: Epidemiologic evidence for work stress as a risk factor for coronary heart disease is mostly based on a single measure of stressful work known as job strain, a combination of high demands and low job control. We examined whether a complementary stress measure that assesses an imbalance between efforts spent at work and rewards received predicted coronary heart disease. Methods: This multi-cohort study (the 'IPD-Work' consortium) was based on harmonized individual-level data from 11 European prospective cohort studies. Stressful work in 90,164 men and women without coronary heart disease at baseline was assessed by validated effort-reward imbalance and job strain questionnaires. We defined incident coronary heart disease as the first non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death. Study-specific estimates were pooled by random-effects meta-analysis. Results: At baseline, 31.7% of study members reported effort-reward imbalance at work and 15.9% reported job strain. During a mean follow-up of 9.8 years, 1078 coronary events were recorded. After adjustment for potential confounders, a hazard ratio of 1.16 (95% confidence interval 1.00-1.35) was observed for effort-reward imbalance compared to no imbalance. The hazard ratio was 1.16 (1.01-1.34) for having either effort-reward imbalance or job strain, and 1.41 (1.12-1.76) for having both these stressors compared to having neither effort-reward imbalance nor job strain. Conclusions: Individuals with effort-reward imbalance at work have an increased risk of coronary heart disease, and this appears to be independent of job strain experienced. These findings support expanding focus beyond just job strain in future research on work stress.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size
509.62 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.