Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/220317 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2017
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Paper No. 229
Verlag: 
Institute for Applied Economic Research (ipea), Brasília
Zusammenfassung: 
This paper contrasts empirically four leading models of inflation dynamics - the accelerationist Phillips curve (APC), the new Keynesian Phillips curve (NKPC), the hybrid Phillips curve (HPC), and the sticky information Phillips curve (SIPC). We employ an encompassing Phillips curve specification that allows us to derive tests for these models within a single framework. According to the generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator, the evidence suggests that the restrictions implied by the NKPC, HPC and SIPC are rejected for the period after the Real Plan in Brazil. Only the restrictions implied by the APC are not rejected. However, when we construct confidence regions that are robust to weak instruments, it is not possible to reject any of the Phillips curve specifications, including the NKPC.
Schlagwörter: 
Phillips curves
weak instruments
fully robust confidence regions
JEL: 
E12
E31
E32
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
2.25 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.