Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/216224 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2020
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Internet Policy Review [ISSN:] 2197-6775 [Volume:] 9 [Issue:] 1 [Publisher:] Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society [Place:] Berlin [Year:] 2020 [Pages:] 1-19
Verlag: 
Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, Berlin
Zusammenfassung: 
Facial-recognition software continues to create heated controversy, as illustrated by ayear-long pilot run at the Berlin-Südkreuz train station. The test run at one of Berlin's mainarteries was a catalyst for media attention, spurring heated discourse on the efficiency andlegitimacy of surveillance technology. Drawing on a critical discourse analysis and (post-)panoptic theory, this paper investigates how the relationship between the public and the state isrepresented, how automated surveillance technology is linguistically framed and whichproblematisations were associated with the technology deployed during the 2017 pilot.
Schlagwörter: 
Science and technology studies (STS)
Algorithmic surveillance
Discourse analysis
(Post-)panoptic theory
Facial recognition software
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
692.97 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.