Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/214444 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2009
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
CREMA Working Paper No. 2009-17
Verlag: 
Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel
Zusammenfassung: 
Peer reviews and rankings today are the backbone of research governance, but recently came under scrutiny. They take explicitly or implicitly agency theory as a theoretical basis. The emerging psychological economics opens a new perspective. As scholarly research is a mainly curiosity driven endeavor, we include intrinsic motivation and supportive feedback by the peers as important determinants of scholarly behavior. We discuss whether a stronger emphasis on selection and socialization offers an alternative to the present regime of academic rankings.
Schlagwörter: 
peer reviews
rankings
research governance
agency theory
psychological economics
new public management
economics of science
control theory
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
256.22 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.