Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/214001
Authors: 
Malcolm, Jeremy
Year of Publication: 
2015
Citation: 
[Journal:] Internet Policy Review [ISSN:] 2197-6775 [Volume:] 4 [Year:] 2015 [Issue:] 4 [Pages:] 1-14
Abstract: 
Just as the so-called multi-stakeholder model of internet governance has attained broad acceptance, it has also begun to attract criticism for how elastic that term is, extending to processes that at best offer limited opportunity for meaningful stakeholder inclusion, and at worst may be a front for corporate self-regulation or government policy whitewashing. There is an apparent need for a set of criteria to distinguish these deficient processes from those that truly do promote policy-making that includes the perspectives of all affected stakeholders. This paper proposes such a set of criteria.
Subjects: 
Multi-stakeholderism
Internet governance
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/legalcode
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.