Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/213400
Authors: 
Jump, Robert Calvert
Stockhammer, Engelbert
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
FMM Working Paper 45
Abstract: 
The natural rate hypothesis states that there exists an unemployment rate at which inflation is stable, and that this unemployment rate is independent of aggregate demand shocks. The hysteresis hypothesis, in contrast, states that the long run unemployment rate can be affected by aggregate demand shocks. While policy makers have warned of the risk of hysteresis since the 2008 financial crash, hysteresis effects are not incorporated into the macroeconometric models used by policy making institutions. This paper presents Bayesian estimates of hysteresis effects using unobserved components models of the type used by the European Commission and OECD. We demonstrate that the posterior probability of the natural rate hypothesis holding in Germany, France, and the UK is very low, lending empirical support to the hysteresis hypothesis. We suggest that the models used by the European Commission and OECD should be amended to reflect policy makers' views on hysteresis.
Subjects: 
Unemployment
Hysteresis
NAIRU
Business Cycles
JEL: 
E24
E60
E61
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
658.93 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.