Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Arulampalam, Wiji
Booth, Alison L.
Bryan, Mark L.
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 595
In this paper we use important new training and wage data from the British Household Panel Survey to estimate the impact of the national minimum wage (introduced in April 1999) on the work-related training of low-wage workers. We use two ?treatment groups? for estimating the impact of the new minimum wage – those workers who explicitly stated they were affected by the new minimum and those workers whose derived 1998 wages were below the minimum. Using difference-in-differences techniques for the period 1998 to 2000, we find no evidence that the introduction of the minimum wage reduced the training of affected workers, and some evidence that it increased it. In particular we find a significant positive effect of about 8 to 11% for affected workers. Consequently our findings can be interpreted as providing no evidence in support of the orthodox human capital model as it applies to work-related training, and some evidence in support of the new theories based on imperfectly competitive labour markets. Our estimates also suggest that two of the goals of the UK government – improving wages of the low paid and developing their skills – have been compatible, at least for the introductory rates of the national minimum wage.
minimum wages
human capital
work-related training
difference-in-differences estimation
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
379.6 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.