Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/210837
Authors: 
Burger, Ronelle
Dang, Canh Thien
Owens, Trudy
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
CREDIT Research Paper 17/10
Abstract: 
Improving ways to assess development efforts is an important task. Yet, little has been done to understand the connection between the effectiveness of NGOs and their financial accountability. We use Benford's Law to assess accuracy of financial reports by a sample of Ugandan NGOs. We find 25% of the sample provide financial information that may be inaccurate to the true values. We find NGOs with better beneficiary ratings are more likely to submit credible financial data. This contradicts the belief that upward accountability demands crowd out serving the client community. We also distinguish between the decision to withhold some requested financial information and the decision to report inaccurately. We find no evidence that the two decisions are related, with the former decision due to limited capacity and skills. The results suggest a bigger role for beneficiary assessments in monitoring the sector, rather than an increasing demand for financial reporting.
Subjects: 
NGOs
diversification
risk aversions
motivations
historic flood
JEL: 
L25
L31
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.