Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Schnedler, Wendelin
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion paper series 235
Contract theory predicts that workers are remunerated based on all available unbiased individual performance measures. In the real world, measures are often biased: tasks are too complex to include all measures, unforeseen contingencies occur for which contracts specify nothing, and the necessity of cooperation and coordination at tasks would be undermined by purely individual measures. Hence, alternative incentive mechanisms are employed (implicit contracts, efficiency wages, wage profiles, tournaments). This suggests that bonus pay is linked to task characteristics: complex tasks will be negatively related to bonus pay, unforeseen contingencies and the necessity to cooperate or coordinate will be positively correlated to premiums on aggregated levels such as team or firm bonus. The present article explores these relations using a French cross-sectional micro-data set. While complexity is found not to be negatively related to bonus pay, the other two effects are supported by the data.
Incentive schemes
bonus pay
three-variate probit
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
364.65 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.