Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/208628
Autoren: 
Li, Xin
Brødsgaard, Kjeld Erik
Jacobsen, Michael
Datum: 
2009
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Copenhagen Discussion Papers No. 2009-29
Zusammenfassung: 
We argue, due to the conspicuous failure of Washington Consensus-guided reforms in most part of the developing world in 1990s and the outbreak of the current global financial crisis, Washington Consensus, as a general term of the neoliberal free market economic thinking, has been withering. In the meantime, Chinese economic model has gain wide recognition and praise worldwide. Joshua C. Ramo coined the term of Beijing Consensus as an alternative approach to economic development for developing nations. There has been hot debate on the notion of Beijing Consensus. We argue even though there are some problems in Ramo's original definition of Beijing Consensus, we should not reject this notion altogether. Instead, we should try to come up with better conceptualizations of this term. In this paper, we sum up ten general principles of the Chinese development model as our new definition of the Beijing Consensus.
Schlagwörter: 
Washington consensus
Beijing consensus
China
Development model
Economic reform
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
109.55 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.