Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/208303
Authors: 
Mathä, Thomas
Millard, Stephen Patrick
Rõõm, Tairi
Wintr, Ladislav
Wyszyński, Robert
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
ECB Working Paper No. 2269
Abstract: 
We use firm-level survey data from 25 EU countries to analyse how firms adjust their labour costs (employment, wages and hours) in response to shocks. We develop a theoretical model to understand how firms choose between different ways to adjust their labour costs. The basic intuition is that firms choose the cheapest way to adjust labour costs. Our empirical findings are in line with the theoretical model and show that the pattern of adjustment is not much affected by the type of the shock (demand shock, access-to-finance shock, "availability of supplies" shock), but differs according to the direction of the shock (positive or negative), its size and persistence. In 2010-13, firms responding to negative shocks were most likely to reduce employment, then hourly wages and then hours worked, regardless of the source of the shock. Results for the 2008-09 period indicate that the ranking might change during deep recession as the likelihood of wage cuts increases. In response to positive shocks in 2010-13, firms were more likely to increase wages, followed by increases in employment and then hours worked suggesting an asymmetric reaction to positive and negative shocks. Finally, we show that strict employment protection legislation and high centralisation or coordination of wage bargaining make it less likely that firms reduce wages when facing negative shocks.
Subjects: 
Shocks
firms
labour cost adjustment
wages
employment
hours
survey
JEL: 
D21
D22
D24
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
ISBN: 
978-92-899-3531-9
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.