Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Breitmoser, Yves
Schweighofer-Kodritsch, Sebastian
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper 151
Li (2017) supports his theoretical notion of obviousness of a dominant strategy with experimental evidence that bidding is closer to dominance in the dynamic ascending-clock than the static second-price auction (private values). We replicate his experimental study and add three intermediate auction formats to decompose this behavioral improvement into cumulative effects of (1) seeing an ascending-price clock (after bid submission), (2) bidding dynamically on the clock and (3) getting drop-out information. Li's theory predicts dominance to become obvious through (2) dynamic bidding. We find no significant behavioral effect of (2). However, both (1) and (3) are highly significant.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
678.96 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.