Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/20783
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBhaumik, Sumon Kumaren_US
dc.contributor.authorEstrin, Saulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T16:16:44Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T16:16:44Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/20783-
dc.description.abstractWe use enterprise data to analyse and contrast the determinants of enterprise performancein China and Russia. We find that in China, enterprise growth and efficiency is associatedwith rapid increases in factor inputs, but not correlated with ownership or institutional factors.However, in Russia, enterprise growth is not associated with increases in factor quantity(except for labor) or quality. The main determinants of company performance are insteaddemand and institutional factors at a regional level. We explore possible interpretations ofthese results, including the impact of institutional and managerial quality.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA) |cBonn-
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aIZA Discussion paper series |x1484en_US
dc.subject.jelP31en_US
dc.subject.jelO12en_US
dc.subject.jelL22en_US
dc.subject.jelD23en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordenterprise performanceen_US
dc.subject.keywordprivatization in Russia and Chinaen_US
dc.subject.stwSystemtransformationen_US
dc.subject.stwPrivatisierungen_US
dc.subject.stwUnternehmensentwicklungen_US
dc.subject.stwVergleichen_US
dc.subject.stwChinaen_US
dc.subject.stwRusslanden_US
dc.titleHow Transition Paths Differ : Enterprise Performance in Russia and Chinaen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn480253005en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
295.33 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.