Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/20783 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBhaumik, Sumon Kumaren
dc.contributor.authorEstrin, Saulen
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T16:16:44Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T16:16:44Z-
dc.date.issued2005-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/20783-
dc.description.abstractWe use enterprise data to analyse and contrast the determinants of enterprise performancein China and Russia. We find that in China, enterprise growth and efficiency is associatedwith rapid increases in factor inputs, but not correlated with ownership or institutional factors.However, in Russia, enterprise growth is not associated with increases in factor quantity(except for labor) or quality. The main determinants of company performance are insteaddemand and institutional factors at a regional level. We explore possible interpretations ofthese results, including the impact of institutional and managerial quality.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA) |cBonnen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aIZA Discussion Papers |x1484en
dc.subject.jelP31en
dc.subject.jelO12en
dc.subject.jelL22en
dc.subject.jelD23en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordenterprise performanceen
dc.subject.keywordprivatization in Russia and Chinaen
dc.subject.stwSystemtransformationen
dc.subject.stwPrivatisierungen
dc.subject.stwUnternehmensentwicklungen
dc.subject.stwVergleichen
dc.subject.stwChinaen
dc.subject.stwRusslanden
dc.titleHow Transition Paths Differ : Enterprise Performance in Russia and China-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn480253005en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size
295.33 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.