Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/207517 
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 12693
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
The empirical literature testing the economic theory of crime has extensively studied the relative importance of the probability and the severity of punishment with reference to planned criminal activities. There are, however, also unplanned crimes and in this paper we focus on a very serious and widespread one, hit-and-run road accidents. In fact, it is not only unplanned, but also largely committed by citizens without criminal records and the decision whether to stay or run must be taken within a few seconds. Using Italian data for the period 1996-2016, we rely on daylight as an exogenous source of variation affecting the probability of apprehension and find that the likelihood of hit-and-run conditional on an accident taking place increases by around 20% with darkness. Relying on two legislative reforms which increased the penalties in case of hit-and-run, we find no significant effect on drivers' behavior. Our results show that criminal activities in unplanned circumstances and under intense time pressure and emotional distress are deterred more by the certainty rather than the severity of legal sanctions.
Subjects: 
crime
hit-and-run
road accidents
punishment
JEL: 
D91
K14
K42
R41
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.49 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.