Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/206967
Authors: 
Mirzabaev, Alisher
Njiraini, Georgina Wambui
Gebremariam, Gebrelibanos
Jourdain, Damien
Magaia, Emílio
Julio, Felita
Mosse, Gerivásia
Mutondo, João
Mungatana, Eric
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
ZEF Working Paper Series 177
Abstract: 
This paper proposes that transboundary water governance needs to become an essential input to sustainable governance of protected natural reserves. The paper reviews the challenges and opportunities for such governance mechanisms, and identifies the factors behind successful practices. Successful transboundary governance of water and nature requires the reduction of associated transaction costs. Firstly, water diplomacy through joint research, data collection and monitoring, capacity building, dialogues for consensus building, promoting responsible leadership and providing advisory support can help in overcoming mistrust between stakeholders and create opportunities for cooperation. Secondly, power asymmetries may hinder transboundary water governance, therefore, there is a need to involve multi-scale links across stakeholders to counter-balance local power asymmetries and engage all stakeholders in consultations and negotiations. Thirdly, transboundary water governance is critically dependent on accurate and transparent data and analysis tools for informing policy decisions. Science-policy interactions for facilitating transboundary water governance were found to be most effective when the knowledge on joint water and nature governance is coproduced in a trans-disciplinary manner, in collaboration with wide-ranging informal networks of scientists, policy makers, and civil society. Finally, transboundary water governance organizations can serve as platforms for facilitating water diplomacy, building trust and cooperation, especially when they are granted the ability to enter into binding cooperative agreements regardless of external political pressures.
Subjects: 
Transboundary water and nature governance
game theory
transaction cost
stakeholder analysis
Olifants river basin
JEL: 
O13
Q01
Q25
Q26
Q51
Q52
Q57
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.