Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/205413 
Authorgroup: 
New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation Inc.
Year of Publication: 
1999
Series/Report no.: 
New Zealand Treasury Working Paper No. 99/10
Publisher: 
New Zealand Government, The Treasury, Wellington
Abstract: 
The methodology for the study involves determining the nature and amount of economic welfare gains and losses resulting from the privatisation of New Zealand Rail, and the incidence among groups in society. The study measures the welfare change that is attributable to the change of ownership. To do this, the study assesses actual economic results against three "counterfactuals" - analyses of what would have happened if NZ Rail had stayed in public ownership. The study finds that welfare has increased from the privatisation of rail. This reflects the remarkable improvement in productivity that took place. It finds that government and taxpayers gained the most from privatisation because of the elimination of their commitment to funding rail losses under public ownership. For instance, it cost taxpayers over $1.1 billion to support NZ Rail between 1983 and 1993, and since the 1880s rail was corporatised five times under state ownership and each time the reorganisation failed to deliver a sustainable improvement. This paper has four parts: Part 1 - The Privatisation of New Zealand Rail ; Part 2 - Labour and Technology ; Part 3 - Quantitative Cost Benefit Analysis ; Part 4 - Owner Net Revenue: Government and Private
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.