Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/205238
Authors: 
Levy, Daniel
Snir, Avichai
Gotler, Alex
Chen, Haipeng (Allan)
Year of Publication: 
2020
Citation: 
[Journal:] Journal of Monetary Economics [ISSN:] 0304-3932 [Issue:] forthcoming
Abstract: 
We document an asymmetry in the rigidity of 9-ending prices relative to non-9-ending prices. Consumers have difficulty noticing higher prices if they are 9-ending, or noticing price-increases if the new prices are 9-ending, because 9-endings are used as a signal for low prices. Price setters respond strategically to the consumer-heuristic by setting 9-ending prices more often after price-increases than after price-decreases. 9-ending prices, therefore, remain 9-ending more often after price-increases than after price-decreases, leading to asymmetric rigidity: 9-ending prices are more rigid upward than downward. These findings hold for both transaction-prices and regular-prices, and for both inflation and no-inflation periods.
Subjects: 
Asymmetric Price Adjustment
Sticky/Rigid Prices
9-Ending Prices
Psychological Prices
Price Points
Regular/Sale Prices
JEL: 
L16
C91
E31
C93
D80
M31
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Manuscript Version (Preprint)

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.69 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.