Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/203239
Authors: 
Macháček , Vít
Srholec, Martin
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
IES Working Paper 20/2019
Abstract: 
The paper maps the infiltration of so-called "predatory" scholarly journals into the citation database Scopus. Using the names of "potential, possible, or probable" predatory journals and publishers on Beall's lists, we derived ISSNs of the respective journals from Ulrichsweb and searched Scopus with it. A total of 324 matched journals with 164 thousand documents indexed in Scopus over 2015-2017, making up a share of 2.8 % of the total articles have been identified. An analysis of cross-country differences in the tendency to publish in these journals reveals that overall the most affected are middle-income countries in Asia and North Africa. Kazakhstan is the country with the largest tendency to publish in predatory journals (18 %). More than 5 % is reported in 20 countries, including large countries such as Indonesia (18 %), Malaysia (11 %), India (10 %), or Nigeria (7 %). Neither developed countries are resistant to predatory publishing. More than 16 000 "potentially predatory" articles were published by authors from United States (0.67 %).
Subjects: 
Predatory journals
Beall's list
open access
academic misconduct
JEL: 
I28
I29
O38
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Social Media Mentions:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
462.25 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.