Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/203156
Authors: 
Bartkowski, Bartosz
Droste, Nils
Ließ, Mareike
Sidemo-Holm, William
Weller, Ulrich
Brady, Mark V.
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
UFZ Discussion Paper 5/2019
Abstract: 
From a theoretical point of view, result-based agri-environmental payments are clearly preferable to action-based payments. However, they suffer from two major practical disadvantages: costs of measuring the results and payment uncertainty for the participating farmers. In this paper, we propose an alternative design to overcome these two disadvantages by means of modelling (instead of measuring) the results. We describe the concept of model-informed result-based agri-environmental payments (MIRBAP), including a hypothetical example of payments for the protection and enhancement of soil functions. We offer a comprehensive discussion of the relative advantages and disadvantages of MIRBAP, showing that it not only unites most of the advantages of result-based and action-based schemes, but also adds two new advantages: the potential to address trade-offs among multiple policy objectives and management for long-term environmental effects. We argue that MIRBAP would be a valuable addition to the agri-environmental policy toolbox and a reflection of recent advancements in agri-environmental modelling.
Subjects: 
agriculture
agri-environmental policy
governance
incentives
JEL: 
Q18
Q24
Q52
Q58
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
467.32 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.