Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/203128 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2019
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Paper No. 412
Verlag: 
European University Viadrina, Department of Business Administration and Economics, Frankfurt (Oder)
Zusammenfassung: 
Creativity assessment can be influenced by social group membership, including gender. This study analyzed implicit biases in the Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT) by examining gender differences in creativity assessment. We asked male (n = 26) and female (n = 39) judges to rate the creativity of fashion outfits presented on Instagram and then examined gender differences in mean creativity ratings and rater consistency (inter-rater reliability). We found no systematic support for gender differences in the level of creativity ratings, but observed that rating consistency was significantly higher for female than for male judges. In an additional qualitative analysis of the implicit criteria that raters applied when assessing creativity, we found that female and male raters attached different relative importance to various assessment criteria. Our study suggests that rater panel composition can indeed affect aspects of creativity assessment, although we do not obtain strong support for a gender-related bias in the CAT methodology.
Schlagwörter: 
Consensual Assessment Technique
creativity assessment
gender differences
fashion
implicit theories of creativity
Instagram
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
730.63 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.