Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/203063 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2018
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
LEM Working Paper Series No. 2018/10
Verlag: 
Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Pisa
Zusammenfassung: 
The European monetary union was born as a result of a negotiation process among the founding countries profoundly influenced by the economic and political dynamics of the '90s: the experience of the EMS, the German unification process, the desire of France to prevent the reaffirmation of German supremacy in the European continent, the need for countries like Italy to reduce the cost of servicing public debt. Despite the strong differences between the countries involved, the conviction prevailed that the German fiscal recipe could be successfully exported to neighboring States and that the centralization of monetary policy at the European Central Bank while keeping fiscal sovereignty at a national level could be achieved without trauma. The experience of the last decade shows, however, that the a monetary union with a derisory federal budget and whose central bank has exclusively an inflation target and cannot act as a lender of last resort in the Member States is endogenously predisposed to the formation of large economic-financial imbalances between the various countries and is particularly vulnerable to exogenous shocks. The reversal of the diverging dynamics still in progress - captured by the unprecedented size of the Target 2 balances of countries such as Germany and Italy - requires a profound rethinking of the European project in accordance with the principles of subsidiarity and of sustainable and shared development enshrined in the Treaties.
Schlagwörter: 
Target 2 balances
risk-sharing
Eurozone overhaul
zero-spread target
public debt mutualization
high-multiplier investments
cancellation of impaired debts
convergence trades
collective action clauses
JEL: 
E02
G01
H12
H63
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
195.95 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.