Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/202944
Authors: 
Girardi, Daniele
Pariboni, Riccardo
Year of Publication: 
2018
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 2018-11
Publisher: 
University of Massachusetts, Department of Economics, Amherst, MA
Abstract: 
As well-known, the canonical Neo-Kaleckian growth model fails to reconcile actual and normal rates of utilization in equilibrium. Some recent contributions revive an old proposal for solving this problem - making the normal rate of utilization an endogenous variable that converges to the actual utilization rate - justifying it with new, micro-founded premises. We argue that these new justifications for the convergence of normal to actual utilization do not stand closer scrutiny. First, the proposed microeconomic model relies on various restrictive assumptions, some of which are mutually inconsistent. Second, the derivation of the macroeconomic adjustment mechanism from the microeconomic analysis involves a logical leap, that can be justified only by a very arbitrary assumption with little economic justification. Finally, we discuss the way in which this mechanism has been incorporated into the Neo-Kaleckian growth model by proposers of this approach. We show that, even if one puts aside, for the sake of argument, the first two points, the existence of autonomous components of demand is sufficient to invalidate the resulting macroeconomic model.
Subjects: 
Capacity Utilization
Normal Rate of Utilization
Neo-Kaleckian model
Economic Growth
JEL: 
B50
E11
E12
E22
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.