Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/20205
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchraepler, Joerg-Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Gert G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T16:12:24Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T16:12:24Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/20205-
dc.description.abstractTo the best of our knowledge, most of the few methodological studies which analyze theimpact of faked interviews on survey results are based on ?artificial fakes? generated byproject students in a ?laboratory environment?. In contrast, panel data provide a uniqueopportunity to identify data which are actually faked by interviewers. By comparing data oftwo waves almost all fakes are easily identifiable. So the raw data of the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) provide a rich source of faked interviews because it is built onseveral sub-samples. However, because interviewers know that panel respondents will beinterviewed again over the course of time, clever interviewers will not fake panel interviews.In fact, in raw data of SOEP the share is about only 0.5 percent of all records. The fakes areused for an analysis of the potential impact of non detected fakes on survey results. Themajor result is that the faked records have no impact on the mean and the proportions. But invery rare, exceptional cases there may be a bias in estimates of correlations and regressioncoefficients if fakes would not be detected. One should note that – except for some fakes inthe first two waves of sample E – faked data were never disseminated within the widely-usedSOEP. The fakes were detected before the data were released.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA) |cBonnen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aIZA Discussion paper series |x969en_US
dc.subject.jelC8en_US
dc.subject.jelC4en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordBenford?s lawen_US
dc.subject.keywordcheatingen_US
dc.subject.keywordcurbstoningen_US
dc.subject.keywordfaked interviewsen_US
dc.subject.keywordquality controlen_US
dc.subject.keywordSOEPen_US
dc.subject.stwPanelen_US
dc.subject.stwInterviewen_US
dc.subject.stwBetrugen_US
dc.subject.stwQualitätsmanagementen_US
dc.subject.stwDeutschlanden_US
dc.titleIdentification, characteristics and impact of faked interviews in surveys : an analysis by means of genuine fakes in the raw data of SOEPen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn377475629en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
880.7 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.