Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/20148
Authors: 
Checchi, Daniele
Filippin, Antonio
Year of Publication: 
2003
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion paper series 912
Abstract: 
The ?prospect of upward mobility? (POUM) hypothesis formalised by Benabou and Ok (2001a) finds explicit assumptions under which some individuals that are poorer than the average optimally choose to oppose redistribution policies. The underlying intuition is that these individuals rationally expect to be richer than average in the future. This result holds provided the mobility process is concave in expectations, redistribution policies are expected to last for a sufficiently long period and individuals are not too risk averse. This paper tests the POUM hypothesis by means of a within subjects experiment where the concavity of the mobility process, the degree of social mobility, the knowledge of personal income and the degree of inequality are used as treatments. Other determinants of the demand for redistribution, such as risk aversion and inequality aversion are (partially) controlled for via either the experiment design or the information collected during the experiment. We find that the POUM hypothesis holds under alternative specifications, even when we control for individual fixed effects.
Subjects: 
POUM
redistribution
mobility
experiment
JEL: 
D63
D31
C91
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
772.39 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.