Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/200709 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2018
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Journal of Applied Leadership and Management [ISSN:] 2194-9522 [Volume:] 6 [Publisher:] Hochschule Kempten - University of Applied Sciences, Professional School of Business & Technology [Place:] Kempten [Year:] 2018 [Pages:] 34-46
Verlag: 
Hochschule Kempten - University of Applied Sciences, Professional School of Business & Technology, Kempten
Zusammenfassung: 
Research questions: To what extent does the operationalisation of the Leadership Productivity Model fulfill the approved scientific quality criteria? Methods: After identifying suitable quality criteria, they were evaluated based on 1,267 questionnaires following the Leadership Productivity Survey (LPS). Dimensions as well as their criteria evaluated by applying e.g. Cronbach's Alpha, item difficulty index, correlation and factor analysis. Results: Apart from very few limitations objectivity is good. Reliability for the en-tire LPS is excellent; the reliability coefficients for each dimension are good. Criterion validity is confirmed, construct validity cannot be con-firmed by Pearson's correlation coefficients, but partly by factor analysis. Summing up the LPS is an objective, completely reliable and partially valid instrument.
URL der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
250.26 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.