Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/200109 
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper No. 2019/8
Publisher: 
Freie Universität Berlin, School of Business & Economics, Berlin
Abstract: 
Was the collapse of world trade between 1928 and 1937 caused by higher transport costs, increased protectionism or the collapse of the gold standard? Using recent advances in the estimation of gravity equations, I examine the partial and general equilibrium effects of bilateral distance, international borders, and the payment system on trade. My results suggest that had average tari and non-tari trade barriers remained at their 1928 level, total international trade would have been 64.6 % higher in 1937. Had the gold standard not collapsed in 1931 and had the British Empire not departed to establish its own currency and trade blocs, international trade would have been 3 % larger. Finally, had transport costs remained at their 1928 level, global trade would not have been significantly different nine years on. These results are supported by over 6,000 new hand-collected observations of ad-valorem ocean freight rates for cotton, which show an average increase of only 1.2 percentage points between 1928 and 1936. When expressed as an index, the movement of freight rates mirrors the evolution of the elasticity of trade to distance over the period.
Subjects: 
International trade
Gravity equation
Great Depression
JEL: 
F10
F12
F13
F33
N70
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
714.11 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.