Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/199219
Authors: 
Altenburg, Tilman
Fischer, Cecilia
Huck, Kerstin
Kruip, Anna
Müller, Sören
Sörensen, Stefanie
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
Studies 94
Abstract: 
Many coastal resources, including fish stocks and mangrove forests, are “common pool resources”. It is difficult to exclude anyone interested from harvesting them, which typically results in overexploitation. The study compares three incentive schemes that may induce resource users to protect or rehabilitate coastal resources: Payments for Ecosystem Services, Environmental Conditional Cash Transfers and Cash for Work. We find that the first two have many prerequisites that make nationwide application very difficult, particularly in developing countries. Cash for Work is easier to implement and works well as a second-best alternative. We document two cases of Cash for Work aimed at the protection of common pool resources in the Philippines: (1) a policy experiment whereby Cash for Work was used to offer alternative sources of income to fisherfolk during a temporary fishing ban when the commercially most important species spawn, and (2) mangrove reforestation programmes. Overall, Cash for Work proved to be effective, but its success was contingent upon policy design. For both cases, the study specifies in detail what is needed to make Cash for Work effective in environmental and social terms.
Subjects: 
Umwelt, Ökosysteme und Ressourcen
ISBN: 
978-3-96021-033-7
Document Type: 
Research Report

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.