Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Petrakis, P.E.
Stamatakis, D.
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Kiel 2005 / Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics 26
This article, adapted from Tamura?s theoretical proposition, empirically investigates capital convergence in three country groups belonging to significantly different development categories: G7, developed and developing. Human capital evaluation, in this context, goes beyond enrolment and/or attainment rates. In addition to enrolments and government spending, alternative factors determining human capital effectiveness synthesize an idea of enhanced human capital proxy. Empirical results indicate moderate evidence of convergence among the three-country groups when conventional variables are included. The convergence ?picture? is quite different when additional variables are empirically examined, implying the existence of a ?convergence trap? caused by initial endowments on human capital.
advanced (OECD)
developed (OECD)
developing (world)
Mauritius (as examples of each of the above)
human capital
Document Type: 
Conference Paper

Files in This Item:
642.25 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.