Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/197743 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2018
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Warwick Papers in Industrial Relations No. 110
Verlag: 
University of Warwick, Industrial Relations Research Unit, Coventry
Zusammenfassung: 
The concept of a 'structured antagonism' in the workplace, introduced in 1986, is revisited and extended. Part of the revisiting clears up misunderstandings about the idea which have arisen as a result of its being cited without always being fully understood. The core idea, that the SA exists because exploitation is inscribed in the organization of work, is defended. There are none the less weaknesses in the initial formulation. In particular, [1] it relied too heavily on the idea that only the direct producers of goods and service produce what has value, namely, the product; and [2] it did not sufficiently ground activity at the point of production in structures of ownership and control. In relation to [1], production also entails co-ordination and planning, and those engaging in such activities are productive. In relation to [2], though co-ordination and planning are productive, exploitation continues to exist because of the rights of control that ownership gives to capitalists. A research implication is the need to examine the links between directly productive labour and the activities of co-ordination and planning.
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
957.87 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.