Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/196126
Authors: 
Böing, Philipp
Müller, Elisabeth
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
ZEW Discussion Papers 19-017
Abstract: 
Because China has become one of the largest applicants of PCT patents, it is of interest to compare the quality of Chinese and non-Chinese applications. We extend a quality index based on internationally comparable citation data from international search reports (ISR) to consider foreign, domestic, and self citations. Whereas foreign citations show that Chinese PCT patent applications reach only a third of the non-Chinese quality benchmark, the extension towards domestic and self citations suggests a higher quality level that converges to or even surpasses the benchmark. We investigate these differences based on firm-level regressions and find that in China, only foreign citations, but not domestic and self citations, have a significant and positive relation to R&D stocks. Using Germany as a representative country without policy support for patenting, we show that all three citations types may be used as economic indicators if policy distortion is not a concern. Our results show that domestic and self citations suffer from an upward bias in China and should be employed with caution if they are to be interpreted as a measure of patent quality.
Subjects: 
patent quality
cross-country comparison
China
JEL: 
O34
O3
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Social Media Mentions:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
502.06 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.