Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/195234 
Year of Publication: 
2016
Citation: 
[Journal:] Latin American Economic Review [ISSN:] 2196-436X [Volume:] 25 [Issue:] 1 [Article No.:] 5 [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Year:] 2016 [Pages:] 1-19
Publisher: 
Springer, Heidelberg
Abstract: 
In this paper, we analyze the nature of cooperation in different corruption regimes. In a laboratory experiment with university students in Mexico, individuals play first a corruption game and then a public goods game. The corruption game is divided into three groups: high- and low-monitoring scenarios as well as a control group not exposed to the game. The public goods game is divided into three groups: the standard game, a game with centralized punishment executed by an exogenously assigned leader, and a game similar to the second one, but adding the possibility of counter-punishment. There are four key results. First, there is more corruption in the low-monitoring group. Second, in the public goods game there is less cooperation in the low-monitoring group than in the group with more intensive monitoring. Third, the option of punishment increases cooperation, but the sensitivity to punishment is greater in the high-monitoring (low-corruption) group. Fourth, the option of counter-punishment of the leader decreases cooperation. Our results highlight the importance of corruption in decreasing trust and social capital and show the difficulty of promoting cooperation when corruption is prevalent.
Subjects: 
Corruption
Cooperation
Leader
Public goods
Laboratory experiment
JEL: 
C90
D73
K42
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
845.21 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.