Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/19465 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorGros, Danielen
dc.contributor.authorSuhrcke, Marcen
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T15:58:15Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T15:58:15Z-
dc.date.issued2000-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/19465-
dc.description.abstractMost countries commonly classified as „in transition“ are still recognisably different from other countries with a similar income per capita in some respects: a larger share of their work force is in industry, they use more energy, they have a more extensive infrastructure and invest more in schooling. However, in terms of the „software“ necessary for a market economy, two groups emerge: the countries that are candidates for EU membership seem to have partly completed the transition. By contrast, the countries from the former Soviet Union that form the CIS and the BALKAN countries, are still lagging behind especially in terms of the enforcement of property rights and the development of financial markets.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aHamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA) |cHamburgen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aHWWA Discussion Paper |x86en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.stwÜbergangswirtschaften
dc.subject.stwWirtschaftliche Anpassungen
dc.subject.stwVergleichen
dc.subject.stwOsteuropaen
dc.titleTen years after: What is special about transition countries?-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn320291928en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:hwwadp:26236en

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
145.43 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.