Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19465
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGros, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuhrcke, Marcen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-28T15:58:15Z-
dc.date.available2009-01-28T15:58:15Z-
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/19465-
dc.description.abstractMost countries commonly classified as ?in transition? are still recognisably different from other countries with a similar income per capita in some respects: a larger share of their work force is in industry, they use more energy, they have a more extensive infrastructure and invest more in schooling. However, in terms of the ?software? necessary for a market economy, two groups emerge: the countries that are candidates for EU membership seem to have partly completed the transition. By contrast, the countries from the former Soviet Union that form the CIS and the BALKAN countries, are still lagging behind especially in terms of the enforcement of property rights and the developmentof financial markets.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aHamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA) |cHamburgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aHWWA Discussion Paper |x86en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.stwÜbergangswirtschaften_US
dc.subject.stwWirtschaftliche Anpassungen_US
dc.subject.stwVergleichen_US
dc.subject.stwOsteuropaen_US
dc.titleTen years after : what is special about transition countries?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn320291928en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen-
dc.identifier.repecRePEc:zbw:hwwadp:26236-

Files in This Item:
File
Size
145.43 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.