Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/194429 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2017
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Journal of Urban Management [ISSN:] 2226-5856 [Volume:] 6 [Issue:] 1 [Publisher:] Elsevier [Place:] Amsterdam [Year:] 2017 [Pages:] 30-41
Verlag: 
Elsevier, Amsterdam
Zusammenfassung: 
This paper proposes that, different though they are, the processes of urban development in China and the UK can be analytically compared by looking at the commonly occurring opposition and resistance to that development. Such opposition and resistance can delay and limit the development of land in and immediately surrounding cities. The paper firstly reviews literature on opposition and resistance to development in both the UK and China, before going on to suggest that this opposition and resistance can in part be explained by a common cause - resentment at opaque and top-down/centralised planning processes. Consequently, the paper concludes that a common solution may applicable in both contexts - increasing participation and building institutional/civic capital amongst communities - and considers the likelihood of implementing this solution, particularly in China.
Schlagwörter: 
Civic Culture
Metagovernance
Participation
Social capital
Urban growth
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Erscheint in der Sammlung:

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
276.55 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.