Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/194035
Autoren: 
Le Yaouanq, Yves
Schwardmann, Peter
Datum: 
2019
Reihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Paper 139
Zusammenfassung: 
How can naivete about present bias persist despite experience? To answer this question, our experiment investigates participants' ability to learn from their own behavior. Participants decide how much to work on a real effort task on two predetermined dates. In the week preceding each work date, they state their commitment preferences and predictions of future effort. While we find that participants are present biased and initially naive about their bias, our methodology enables us to establish that they are Bayesian in how they learn from their experience at the first work date. A treatment in which we vary the nature of the task at the second date further shows that learning is unencumbered by a change in environment. Our results suggest that persistent naivete cannot be explained by a fundamental inferential bias. At the same time, we find that participants initially underestimate the information that their experience will provide - a bias that may lead to underinvestment in experimentation and a failure to activate self-regulation mechanisms.
Schlagwörter: 
naivete
present bias
learning
JEL: 
D83
D90
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
648.53 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.