Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/193560
Authors: 
Groenewegen, Jesse
Wierts, Peter
Year of Publication: 
2017
Series/Report no.: 
ESRB Working Paper Series No. 53
Abstract: 
Systemically important banks are subject to at least two departures from the neutrality of debt versus equity financing: the tax deductibility of interest payments and implicit funding subsidies. This paper fills a gap in the literature by comparing their mechanism and interaction within a common analytical framework. Findings indicate that both the tax shield and implicit funding subsidy remain large, in the order of up to 1 percent of GDP, despite decreases in recent years. But the underlying mechanisms differ. The tax shield incentivises debt financing as it reduces tax payments to the government. The implicit funding subsidy incentivises debt financing as it lowers private bankruptcy costs. This funding subsidy is passed on to other bank stakeholders. It therefore provides incentives for increases in balance sheet size and risk taking. This, in turn, increases the value of the tax shield. Overall, these results help to explain why systemically important banks are highly leveraged.
Subjects: 
taxation
subsidies
debt
leverage
JEL: 
G21
G32
H25
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
ISBN: 
978-92-95210-40-0
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
871.66 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.