Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/19343
Authors: 
Straubhaar, Thomas
Suhrcke, Marc
Urban, Dieter M.
Year of Publication: 
2002
Series/Report no.: 
HWWA Discussion Paper 181
Abstract: 
This paper tests a geography and growth model using regional data for Europe, the US, and Japan. We set up a standard geography and growth model with a poverty trap and derive a log-linearized growth equation that corresponds directly to a threshold regression technique in econometrics. In particular, we test whether regions with high population density (centers) grow faster and have a permanently higher per capita income than regions with low population density (peripheries). We find geography driven divergence for US states and European regions after 1980. Population density is superior in explaining divergence compared to initial income which the most important official EU eligibility criterium for regional aid is built on. Divergence is stronger on smaller regional units (NUTS3) than on larger ones (NUTS2). Human capital and R&D are likely candidates for transmission channels of divergence processes.
Subjects: 
threshold estimation
new economic geography
regional income
growth
poverty trap
regime shifts
bootstrap
JEL: 
O41
F12
R11
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
528.5 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.